SUPPLIER SEGMENTATION BASED ON PERFORMANCE DATA USING HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2026.104.02Keywords:
adaptive supplier segmentation, hierarchical clustering, supplier evaluation, cluster validation, supply chain management, multi-criteria decision analysis, performance-based clustering, supplier performance analysisAbstract
In many manufacturing environments, procurement managers must regularly compare suppliers with significantly different performance profiles, which makes structured evaluation essential. Grouping suppliers with similar performance characteristics can make procurement decisions more transparent and easier to justify in practice. However, supplier performance is typically described by multiple evaluation criteria measured on different scales, and these performance characteristics may change over time. For this reason, analytical approaches are required that can handle both the multidimensional nature of the data and the changes in supplier performance over time. In this paper, an adaptive supplier segmentation approach is developed based on hierarchical clustering techniques. Supplier performance is evaluated using multiple operational criteria, including quality rate, on-time delivery, unit price, lead time, complaint frequency, and operational flexibility. After applying min–max normalization and weighted performance evaluation, supplier similarities are calculated using Euclidean distance, and hierarchical clustering methods are applied to identify homogeneous supplier groups. Several linkage strategies are compared, and the clustering quality is assessed using internal validation indices such as the Silhouette, Davies–Bouldin, Calinski–Harabasz, and Dunn indices. The empirical analysis is conducted on a dataset containing 15 suppliers observed in two consecutive evaluation periods. The results indicate that hierarchical clustering can reveal interpretable supplier groups with clearly distinguishable performance profiles. A comparison of clustering structures across consecutive periods also shows that supplier segmentation evolves as new performance data become available.
References
Siino M., Iezzi S., Gara M. Corruption risk indicators in public procurement: Definition and evaluation with organised crime data. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2026, № 105, 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102429
Ghyas Q.M., Akter T. Critical Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) in Procurement Management Information System (PROMIS): The Case of Bangladesh. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2024, pp. 405 – 409. https://doi.org/10.1145/3670013.3670014
Hoque I., Sumi R.S. Buyer-supplier relational dynamics and supplier dynamic capabilities for improving environmental sustainability mitigating climate change vulnerabilities. Climatic Change. 2026, № 179, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-04096-y
Keskin G.A. A Novel Perspective to Sustainable Supplier Performance Evaluation Problem: A Case Study Based on Determining the Optimum Number of Clusters. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. 2022, № 21, pp. 1349 – 1379. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622022500195
Rahiminia M., Razmi J., Shahrabi Farahani S., Sabbaghnia A. Cluster-based supplier segmentation: a sustainable data-driven approach. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications. 2023, № 5, pp. 209 - 228. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSCRA-05-2023-0017
Ogasawara, Y., Kon, M. Two clustering methods based on the Ward's method and dendrograms with interval-valued dissimilarities for interval-valued data. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2021, № 129, pp. 103 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.11.001
Ros, F., Riad, R., Guillaume, S. PDBI: A partitioning Davies-Bouldin index for clustering evaluation. Neurocomputing. 2023, № 528, pp. 178 – 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.01.043
Preedasawakul, O., Wiroonsri, N. A Bayesian cluster validity index. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2025, № 202, 108053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2024.108053
Ncir, C.E.B., Hamza, A., Bouaguel, W. Parallel and scalable Dunn Index for the validation of big data clusters. Parallel Computing. 2021, № 102, 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2021.102751
Krasnodębska, K., Goch, W., Uhl, J.H., Verstegen, J.A., Pesaresi, M. Advancing Precision, Recall, F-score, and Jaccard index: An approach for continuous, ratio-scale measurements. Environmental Modelling & Software 2025. № 193, 106614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106614
Chen, J., Qi, S., Wang, F., Xing, L., Chen, Y. An Jaccard similarity coefficient-based evolutionary algorithm for sparse large-scale multi-objective optimization problems. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation. 2026. № 100, 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2025.102269
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this Collection agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Collection right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Collection.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Collection's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this Collection.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.