SUPPLIER SEGMENTATION BASED ON PERFORMANCE DATA USING HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2026.104.02

Keywords:

adaptive supplier segmentation, hierarchical clustering, supplier evaluation, cluster validation, supply chain management, multi-criteria decision analysis, performance-based clustering, supplier performance analysis

Abstract

In many manufacturing environments, procurement managers must regularly compare suppliers with significantly different performance profiles, which makes structured evaluation essential. Grouping suppliers with similar performance characteristics can make procurement decisions more transparent and easier to justify in practice. However, supplier performance is typically described by multiple evaluation criteria measured on different scales, and these performance characteristics may change over time. For this reason, analytical approaches are required that can handle both the multidimensional nature of the data and the changes in supplier performance over time. In this paper, an adaptive supplier segmentation approach is developed based on hierarchical clustering techniques. Supplier performance is evaluated using multiple operational criteria, including quality rate, on-time delivery, unit price, lead time, complaint frequency, and operational flexibility. After applying min–max normalization and weighted performance evaluation, supplier similarities are calculated using Euclidean distance, and hierarchical clustering methods are applied to identify homogeneous supplier groups. Several linkage strategies are compared, and the clustering quality is assessed using internal validation indices such as the Silhouette, Davies–Bouldin, Calinski–Harabasz, and Dunn indices. The empirical analysis is conducted on a dataset containing 15 suppliers observed in two consecutive evaluation periods. The results indicate that hierarchical clustering can reveal interpretable supplier groups with clearly distinguishable performance profiles. A comparison of clustering structures across consecutive periods also shows that supplier segmentation evolves as new performance data become available.

Author Biography

Bányai Ágota, University of Miskolc, Hungary

Dr., egyetemi docens, Institute of Logistics, University of Miskolc, Miskolc - Egyetemváros, Hungary

References

Siino M., Iezzi S., Gara M. Corruption risk indicators in public procurement: Definition and evaluation with organised crime data. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2026, № 105, 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102429

Ghyas Q.M., Akter T. Critical Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators (KPI) in Procurement Management Information System (PROMIS): The Case of Bangladesh. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2024, pp. 405 – 409. https://doi.org/10.1145/3670013.3670014

Hoque I., Sumi R.S. Buyer-supplier relational dynamics and supplier dynamic capabilities for improving environmental sustainability mitigating climate change vulnerabilities. Climatic Change. 2026, № 179, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-04096-y

Keskin G.A. A Novel Perspective to Sustainable Supplier Performance Evaluation Problem: A Case Study Based on Determining the Optimum Number of Clusters. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. 2022, № 21, pp. 1349 – 1379. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622022500195

Rahiminia M., Razmi J., Shahrabi Farahani S., Sabbaghnia A. Cluster-based supplier segmentation: a sustainable data-driven approach. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications. 2023, № 5, pp. 209 - 228. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSCRA-05-2023-0017

Ogasawara, Y., Kon, M. Two clustering methods based on the Ward's method and dendrograms with interval-valued dissimilarities for interval-valued data. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2021, № 129, pp. 103 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.11.001

Ros, F., Riad, R., Guillaume, S. PDBI: A partitioning Davies-Bouldin index for clustering evaluation. Neurocomputing. 2023, № 528, pp. 178 – 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.01.043

Preedasawakul, O., Wiroonsri, N. A Bayesian cluster validity index. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2025, № 202, 108053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2024.108053

Ncir, C.E.B., Hamza, A., Bouaguel, W. Parallel and scalable Dunn Index for the validation of big data clusters. Parallel Computing. 2021, № 102, 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2021.102751

Krasnodębska, K., Goch, W., Uhl, J.H., Verstegen, J.A., Pesaresi, M. Advancing Precision, Recall, F-score, and Jaccard index: An approach for continuous, ratio-scale measurements. Environmental Modelling & Software 2025. № 193, 106614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106614

Chen, J., Qi, S., Wang, F., Xing, L., Chen, Y. An Jaccard similarity coefficient-based evolutionary algorithm for sparse large-scale multi-objective optimization problems. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation. 2026. № 100, 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2025.102269

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

Issue

Section

Mechanical processing of materials, the theory of cutting materials, mathematical and computer simulation of machining p