EVALUATION OF MACHINABILITY BASED ON CUTTING FORCE AND SURFACE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS USING THE TOPSIS METHOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2026.104.09Keywords:
machinability, CNC milling, TOPSIS, multi-criteria decision making, surface roughnessAbstract
The study proposes a multi-criteria machinability evaluation based on cutting forces, surface quality, and productivity characteristics obtained from CNC milling experiments. Three tool steels (1.2379, 1.2842, and ES Aktuell 1200) and four long-reach milling cutters were tested under controlled machining conditions. The experimental data set, including force components and surface roughness parameters, was analysed using the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method to integrate multiple performance indicators into a single metric, referred to as the Cutting Ability Index (CAI). The results show that the proposed approach enables the ranking of material-tool combinations and provides a more comprehensive interpretation of machinability compared to single-parameter evaluations. However, the resulting rankings are sensitive to the selection and balance of input criteria and, in certain cases, deviate from expected physical behaviour. This highlights the limitations of equally weighted multi-criteria approaches and underscores the importance of appropriate parameter selection and weighting. The study confirms that while TOPSIS can serve as an effective decision-support tool in machining analysis, its application requires careful methodological consideration.
References
Debnath, S., Reddy, M. M., & Yi, Q. S. (2016). Influence of cutting parameters on surface roughness and tool wear in turning process. Materials Today: Proceedings, 3(6):1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.
Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica, 25(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2014.
Bhardwaj, V., Gaur, M. K., Chaturvedi, V., & Agrawal, S. (2018). Optimization of machining parameters for Nylon-6 composite in CNC turning using PCA-based TOPSIS. International Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. PDF: https://scispace.com/pdf/optimization-of-machining-parameters-for-nylon-6-composite-bvrc9tzr12.pdf
Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2002). Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
Chakraborty, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). A scoping review on the applications of MCDM techniques for parametric optimization of machining processes. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29: 4165–4186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09731-w
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Reddy, V. V. (2020). Turning process parameters optimization of AL7075 hybrid MMC’s composite using TOPSIS method. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(4):1905–1914. PDF: https://sigma.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1635421562-en.pdf
Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this Collection agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Collection right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Collection.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Collection's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this Collection.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.