INFLUENCE OF MACHINING-BASED POST-PROCESSING ON THE SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY OF DMLS 316L STAINLESS STEEL FOR FUSION-RELEVANT APPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2025.103.04Keywords:
additive manufacturing, DMLS 316L stainless steel, surface topography, post-processing, fusion technology applicationsAbstract
This study investigates the effect of machining-based post-processing on the surface topography of Direct Metal Laser Sintered (DMLS) 316L stainless steel intended for fusion-relevant applications. Cubic samples (30 × 30 × 30 mm) were produced by additive manufacturing and subsequently finished by face milling and surface grinding under two parameter settings each. The surface topography was characterized using an AltiSurf 520 optical system in accordance with ISO 25178. The as-printed surface exhibited high roughness (Sa = 8.899 µm, Sz = 79.427 µm), while all post-processed surfaces showed significant improvements. The lowest roughness (Sa = 1.346 µm) was obtained after grinding at 7 m/min feed rate. Skewness and kurtosis analysis indicated that machining transformed the peak-dominated surface into a more uniform, near-Gaussian texture. The results confirm that controlled milling and grinding operations can effectively enhance the surface integrity of DMLS 316L components. These findings demonstrate the potential of hybrid additive–subtractive manufacturing to produce surfaces suitable for the vacuum and functional requirements of fusion technology applications.
References
Leung, Y., Kwok, T., Li, X., Yang, Y., Wang, C. C. L., & Chen, Y. Challenges and status on design and Computation for emerging additive manufacturing Technologies. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 19(2). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041913
Zhou, L., Miller, J., Vezza, J., Mayster, M., Raffay, M., Justice, Q., Tamimi, Z. A., Hansotte, G., Sunkara, L. D., & Bernat, J. Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive review. Sensors, 24(9), 2668. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24092668
Nandy, J., Sarangi, H., & Sahoo, S. A review on Direct Metal Laser sintering: process features and microstructure modeling. Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 6(3), 280–316. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40516-019-00094-y
Maurya, N. K., Sharma, R., Kumar, N., Kumar, A., Anand, P., Rai, P., & Singh, H. An overview of investigation of Fatigue, tensile strength and hardness of the components fabricated through direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) process. Materials Today Proceedings, 47, 3979–3984. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.131
Babu, A. S., Jaivignesh, M., Srinivasan, S., & Sugavaneswaran, M. Design of Functional Gradient Porous Structure and its Fabrication using DMLS Process. Materials Today Proceedings, 24, 1561–1569. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.476
Seharing, A., Azman, A. H., & Abdullah, S. A review on integration of lightweight gradient lattice structures in additive manufacturing parts. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(6). 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020916951
Tirnovean, A., Csoregi, N., Borzan, C., & Varga, G. A REVIEW OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN THE MEDICAL FIELD. Cutting & Tools in Technological System, 101, 3–16. 2024. https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2024.101.01
Mehdiyev, Z., & Felho, C. Metal Additive Manufacturing in Automotive Industry: A Review of Applications, Advantages, and Limitations. Materials Science Forum, 1103, 49–62. 2023. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-bg0nin
Ye, C., Zhang, C., Zhao, J., & Dong, Y. Effects of post-processing on the surface finish, porosity, residual stresses, and fatigue performance of additive manufactured metals: a review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 30(9), 6407–6425. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06021-7
Patterson, A. E., Messimer, S. L., & Farrington, P. A. Overhanging features and the SLM/DMLS residual stresses problem: review and future research need. Technologies, 5(2), 15. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies5020015
Neuberger, H., Hernandez, F., Ruck, S., Arbeiter, F., Bonk, S., Rieth, M., ... & Volker, K. U. Advances in Additive Manufacturing of fusion materials. Fusion Engineering and Design, 167, 112309. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112309
Giancarli, L., Chuyanov, V., Abdou, M., Akiba, M., Hong, B., Lässer, R., Pan, C., & Strebkov, Y. Test blanket modules in ITER: An overview on proposed designs and required DEMO-relevant materials. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 367–370, 1271–1280. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.234
Bachmann, C., Ciattaglia, S., Cismondi, F., Eade, T., Federici, G., Fischer, U., Franke, T., Gliss, C., Hernandez, F., Keep, J., Loughlin, M., Maviglia, F., Moro, F., Morris, J., Pereslavtsev, P., Taylor, N., Vizvary, Z., & Wenninger, R. Overview over DEMO design integration challenges and their impact on component design concepts. Fusion Engineering and Design, 136, 87–95. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.12.040
Day, C., & Murdoch, D. The ITER vacuum systems. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 114, 012013. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/114/1/012013
Moon, H., Park, S., Kim, H., & Kim, B. S. Evaluation of the functional acceptability of the ITER vacuum vessel. Nuclear Fusion, 63(1), 016003. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aca1d0
D’Andrea, D. Additive manufacturing of AISI 316L stainless steel: a review. Metals, 13(8), 1370. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13081370
Zhong, Y., Rännar, L., Liu, L., Koptyug, A., Wikman, S., Olsen, J., Cui, D., & Shen, Z. Additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel by electron beam melting for nuclear fusion applications. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 486, 234–245. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.042
Gu, D., & Shen, Y. Processing conditions and microstructural features of porous 316L stainless steel components by DMLS. Applied Surface Science, 255(5), 1880–1887. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.118
Aziz, U., McAfee, M., Manolakis, I., Timmons, N., & Tormey, D. A review of optimization of additively manufactured 316/316L stainless steel process parameters, Post-Processing Strategies, and defect mitigation. Materials, 18(12), 2870. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122870
Ojo, O. O., & Taban, E. Post-processing treatments–microstructure–performance interrelationship of metal additive manufactured aerospace alloys: A review. Materials Science and Technology, 39(1), 1–41. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2022.2130530
Kaynak, Y., & Kitay, O. Porosity, Surface Quality, Microhardness and Microstructure of Selective Laser Melted 316L Stainless Steel Resulting from Finish Machining. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2(2), 36. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp2020036
Guzanová, A., Ižaríková, G., Brezinová, J., Živčák, J., Draganovská, D., & Hudák, R. Influence of Build Orientation, Heat Treatment, and Laser Power on the Hardness of Ti6Al4V Manufactured Using the DMLS Process. Metals, 7(8), 318. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7080318
Melia, M. A., Duran, J. G., Koepke, J. R., Saiz, D. J., Jared, B. H., & Schindelholz, E. J. How build angle and post-processing impact roughness and corrosion of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Npj Materials Degradation, 4(1). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-020-00126-5
Diniță, A., Neacșa, A., Portoacă, A. I., Tănase, M., Ilinca, C. N., & Ramadan, I. N. Additive Manufacturing Post-Processing Treatments, a Review with Emphasis on Mechanical Characteristics. Materials, 16(13), 4610. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134610
Romanescu, P., Omidvarkarjan, D., Ferchow, J., & Meboldt, M. Evaluation of the Ultra-High Vacuum Suitability of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Manufactured stainless steel 316L. In Springer tracts in additive manufacturing (pp. 407–422). 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42983-5_27
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this Collection agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Collection right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this Collection.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Collection's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this Collection.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.