PROJECT MANAGEMENT BASICS FOR 3D CONCRETE PRINTING: TIME CALCULATION STANDARDS FOR DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGICAL PREPARATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2025.103.11

Keywords:

concrete 3D printing, project management, time standards, complexity classification, quality assurance, defect detection

Abstract

This research establishes the first comprehensive project management framework for 3DCP through quantitative standards for design preparation, technological setup, and quality management. Based on systematic analysis of construction projects completed during 2023-2025 by "Geopolimer" LTD (Kharkiv, Ukraine), we developed mathematical models for time estimation incorporating perimeter length, geometric complexity, and feature count parameters. Regression analysis of project data enabled formulation of predictive equations: design preparation time accounts for base setup, perimeter-dependent modeling, and complexity coefficients (complex curved surfaces with architectural details). Technological preparation time integrates G-code generation, trajectory verification per meter, and build step validation. A systematic complexity classification system evaluates four geometric factors: curved surfaces percentage, architectural detail count, protruding elements, and internal cavity complexity, enabling quantitative risk assessment and resource allocation decisions. The framework incorporates a three-level quality management system with standardized defect classification (aesthetic, attention-required, critical) defining acceptance criteria for crack dimensions, surface porosity, and structural integrity. Trajectory verification methodology enables proactive defect identification, detecting 85-90% of potential issues before production begins. Economic analysis demonstrates 8-12% rework cost avoidance, 15‒20% preparation time savings, and 5‒10% schedule compression, with return on investment achieved within 0.5‒1.5 months. Case study validation on a 174 m² residential structure demonstrates framework effectiveness: calculated preparation time of 45.1 hours versus actual 47.2 hours. The framework facilitates 3DCP transition from experimental technology to predictable industrial process, enabling evidence-based project planning, systematic risk management, and competitive market positioning. Future research directions include expansion to additional printer types, integration with Building Information Modeling workflows, real-time computer vision quality monitoring, and long-term performance tracking for continuous standard refinement.

Author Biographies

Garashchenko Yaroslav, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Doct. of Techn. Sci., Associate Professor Department of Integrated Technologies of Mechanical Engineering named after M.F. Semko, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Kharkiv, Ukraine

Malyniak Andrii, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Postgraduate, Department of Integrated Technologies of Mechanical Engineering named after M.F. Semko, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute», Kharkiv, Ukraine

Kucher Ruslan, Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

Master's degree, Department of Management and Marketing, Mykolaiv National Agrarian University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

References

Athira, R., Sathyan, D. Review of 3d Printing Advancements in Geopolymer Concrete: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Materials, Modeling, and Analysis for Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure Volume 1. AMMA SRI 2025. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 719. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-0229-5_39.

Garashchenko, Y., Harashchenko, O., Kucher, R. Additive technologies in construction: technical, economic and management analysis. Cutting & Tools in Technological System, (101), 2024. 103‒115. https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7405.2024.101.10.

Alhaidary, H. Three-Dimensional Concrete Printing as a Construction Automation Strategy and Assessments from a Case Study Building. Journal of Architectural Engineering. Vol.30, 2. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1714.

Sepasgozar, S.M., Davis, S. Modelling the Construction Technology Implementation Framework: An Empirical Study. Proceedings of the 32nd ISARC. p. 1‒8. 2015. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2015/0103.

Waqar, A., Othman, I., Hayat, S., Radu, D., Khan, M.B., Galatanu, T.F., Almujibah, H.R., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Benjeddou, O. Building Information Modeling ‒ Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management. Buildings 2023, 13, 2041. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ buildings13082041.

Yucel, B., Azhar, S. Investigating critical success factors and risks of construction technology startups: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Construction Management, 24, p. 1655‒1667. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2286109.

Bos, F. P., Wolfs, R. J. M., Ahmed, Z. Y., Salet, T.A.M. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11(3), 209‒225. 2016. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867.

Hossny, H.E., Ibrahim, A.H. and Elnady, A. Assessment of construction project complexity. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 15(1), pp.414‒423, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149502115010414.

Lu, W., Tan, T., Xu, J., Wang, J., Chen, K., Gao, S. & Xue, F. Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) in construction: The old and the new. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, in press. 17p. 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17452007.2020.1768505.

Wolfs, R., Bos, D., Caron, J., Gerke, M., Mesnil, R., Buswell, R., Ducoulombier, N., Hack, N., Keita, E., Kinnell, P., Mawas, K., Mechtcherine, V., Miranda, L., Sokolov, D., Versteege, J., & Roussel, N. On-line and in-line quality assessment across all scale levels of 3D concrete printing. Cement and Concrete Research. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107646.

Balakrishna, K., Tiwari, D.V., Deshpande, D.A., Patil, S.R., Garg, D.A., & Geetha, D.B. Computer Vision for Automated Quality Inspection in Manufacturing. 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI), 1‒6. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCAI61061.2024.10601894.

Jeyifous, O.A., Schönsee, E., Strangfeld, C., & Hüsken, G. Investigating the impact of material rheology on geometric accuracy in 3D concrete printing using real-time monitoring. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing. 2025. https://doi.org/10.58286/31704.

Pena, N.M., Vieira, J.G., & Mano, A.P. Systematic Review on Risk Management on maintenance. 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/ENEGEP2021_TI_ST_354_1822_42829.

Senouci, A., Bowlekar, U.N., Khalafi, S.A. and Eldin, N., A multi objective scheduling model for minimization of construction project duration, total cost and environmental impact. In Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference. (2019) 025. https://doi.org/10.3311/ccc2019-025.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

Issue

Section

Addition technologies in mechanical engineering